TestNavBarHorizontal
Disclaimer:  BS Kids LLC legal research and information has been prepared for educational and informational purposes only. This material is not
legal advice or legal opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create and receipt does not constitute a
lawyer-client relationship between BS Kids LLC , the author of the information and any other legal publisher. Customers of BS Kids should not act
upon this information without seeking professional counsel.  The opinions expressed in the material presented to BS Kids clientele is based on
information found in legal publications.  BS Kids LLC, 78 Canterberry Court, Hudson, NH 03051 781-756-1214.
WELCOME
Home                      Legislation                   Get Involved                           News
Services                   
About Us                       Stats & Research             Contact Us
A Child Advocacy Company
Bringing Support to Parents
Building Strength to Children
News



CALIFORNIA SCHEMIN'
WorldNetDaily

Spanking swatted by lawmaker
'Children are unruly because they aren't disciplined,' critic states

Posted: April 04, 2008
11:45 pm Eastern

Spanking apparently is headed for another swatting in the California Legislature, as Assemblywoman Sally
Lieber, D-Mountain View, has reintroduced a proposal to effectively ban such discipline, even by parents,
according to the Capitol Resource Family Impact organization. "Last session this same bill received
national attention because of its assault on parents rights to discipline their children," said Karen England,
executive director with the group. "We succeeded in stopping the bill because parents were so outraged
that an arrogant lawmaker thinks she knows better than parents how to raise their children." Last year's
plan as AB755, and this year's, AB 2943, is virtually the same, England said.

"According to AB 2943, a parent who spanks their child would be placed on probation for a minimum of
four years, and would be forced to attend a 'nonviolent parental education class' and the child would
receive a criminal court protective order 'protecting the victim from further acts of violence or threats' and
'residence exclusion or stay-away conditions,'" England said. The bill itself dumps parental discipline into
categories previously reserve for child abuse.
"Existing law makes it a crime for any person, under specified circumstances, to willfully cause or permit a
child to suffer, or to inflict on a child unjustifiable physical pain or mental suffering," the document reads.
"This bill would authorize the finder of fact to consider the use of an implement, the throwing, kicking,
burning, or cutting of a child, the striking of a child with a closed fist, the striking of a child under 3 years of
age, the interference with a child's breathing, or the brandishing of a deadly weapon upon a child when
determining whether or not a defendant willfully caused any child to suffer…"

"AB 2943 declares it illegal to inflict 'physical pain or mental suffering.' These ambiguous terms include any
suffering cause by instruments including (but not limited to) 'a stick, a rod, a switch, an electrical cord, an
extension cord, a belt, a broom, or a shoe.' Parents often use wooden spoons or rulers to discipline a
disobedient child. Under AB 2943, such discipline would be illegal," England said. "In the legislature we
often hear that schools have become too unsafe and we need 'sensitivity' or 'tolerance' training," added
Meredith Turney, legislative liaison for CRFI. "But the reason children are unruly is because they aren't
being disciplined. Taking away the rights of parents to lovingly discipline their children will only worsen the
behavior problems that justify indoctrination classes in schools." England said current law already
addresses abuse adequately.

"This bill goes much further and seeks to prohibit parents from raising healthy, responsible children," she
said. "There is contempt in the legislature for Judeo- Christian values and AB 2943 is the most blatant
evidence of this attempt to take away our freedom to raise children according to our beliefs," Turney said.
Lieber's plan a year ago eventually died. But not before a number of California voices were critical. The
Contra Costa Times said the bill "is completely unenforceable. Are we to expect a 2-year-old to dial 911
and report a parent for swatting him or her on the behind?"

The newspaper's editorial took a straightforward shot at the issue. "With all of the pressing problems
facing our state, what issue has the knickers of our esteemed lawmakers in such a twist? What burning
concern has the ponderous pundits on the cable news shows frothing at the mouth? "Global warming?
Plunging real estate values? Good-paying jobs being shipped off to India every time you turn around?
Maybe the governor's new health care proposal? "None of the above.

"The latest meaningless, national distraction is a silly bill proposed by Assembly Pro Tem Speaker Sally
Lieber, D-Mountain View, that would make it a crime to spank any child 3 years old or younger." The
editorial's suggestion? "Get real."