Page Title

Disclaimer: BS Kids LLC legal research and information has been prepared for educational and informational purposes only. This material is not
legal advice or legal opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create and receipt does not constitute a
lawyer-client relationship between BS Kids LLC , the author of the information and any other legal publisher. Customers of BS Kids should not act
upon this information without seeking professional counsel. The opinions expressed in the material presented to BS Kids clientele is based on
information found in legal publications. BS Kids LLC, 78 Canterberry Court, Hudson, NH 03051 781-756-1214.

A Child Advocacy Company
Bringing Support to Parents
Building Strength to Children

News

Study: Single parents cost taxpayers $112 billion

NEW YORK (AP) -- Divorce and out-of-wedlock childbearing cost U.S. taxpayers more than $112 billion a
year, according to a study commissioned by four groups advocating more government action to bolster
marriages.

Sponsors say the study is the first of its kind and hope it will prompt lawmakers to invest more money in
programs aimed at strengthening marriages. Two experts not connected to the study said such programs
are of dubious merit and suggested that other investments -- notably job creation -- would be more
effective in aiding all types of needy families.

There have been previous attempts to calculate the cost of divorce in America. But the sponsors of the
new study, being released Tuesday, said theirs is the first to gauge the broader cost of "family
fragmentation" -- both divorce and unwed childbearing.

The study was conducted by Georgia State University economist Ben Scafidi. His work was sponsored by
four groups who consider themselves part of a nationwide "marriage movement" -- the New York-based
Institute for American Values, the Institute for Marriage and Public Policy, Families Northwest of Redmond,
Washington, and the Georgia Family Council, an ally of the conservative ministry Focus on the Family.
"The study documents for the first time that divorce and unwed childbearing -- besides being bad for
children -- are costing taxpayers a ton of money," said David Blankenhorn, president of the Institute for
American Values. We keep hearing this from state legislators, 'Explain to me why this is any of my
business? Aren't these private matters?"' Blankenhorn said. "Take a look at these numbers and tell us if
you still have any doubt."

Scafidi's calculations were based on the assumption that households headed by a single female have
relatively high poverty rates, leading to higher spending on welfare, health care, criminal justice and
education for those raised in the disadvantaged homes. The $112 billion estimate includes the cost of
federal, state and local government programs, and lost tax revenue at all levels of government. Reducing
these costs, Scafidi said, "is a legitimate concern of government, policymakers and legislators."

While the study doesn't offer formal recommendations, it does suggest that state and federal lawmakers
consider investing more money in programs intended to bolster marriages. Such a program has been in
place in Oklahoma since 2001; Texas last year earmarked about $15 million in federal funds for marriage
education.

"Because of the very large taxpayer costs associated with high rates of divorce and unwed childbearing,
and the modest price tags associated with most marriage-strengthening initiatives ... programs even with
very modest success rates will be cost-effective," the study says.

But Tim Smeeding, an economics professor at the Maxwell School of Syracuse University, who was not
involved in the study, said he's seen no convincing evidence that the marriage-strengthening programs
work. I have nothing against marriage -- relationship-building is great," he said. "But alone it's not going to
do the job. A full-employment economy would probably be the best thing -- decent, stable jobs." He also
noted the distinctive problems arising in black urban areas where the rate of single-mother households is
highest.

"A high number of African-American men have been in prison -- that limits their future earning potential
and makes them bad marriage partners, regardless of what kind of person they are," Smeeding said. "A
marriage program doesn't address that problem at all."

Another expert not connected to the study, University of Michigan sociologist Pamela Smock, suggested
that bigger investments in education would pay long-term dividends -- improving economic prospects even
for children from fragmented, disadvantaged families. "Providing a global number doesn't give us anything
to go on," said Smock, who was skeptical of the study's $112 billion estimate.

"We're now nearing 40 percent of kids in America born out of wedlock," she said. "I can't fathom that those
marriage programs, even with increased investment, are going to reduce that."

Blankenhorn said it was "fair criticism" to note that the study made multiple references to
marriage-strengthening programs while not proposing other strategies for reducing the cost of family
fragmentation.
"Maybe we should have been more ecumenical," he said. "Let everybody have their say. Let's try things
out. ... Nobody knows exactly the strategies which are going to work."