Disclaimer: BS Kids LLC legal research and information has been prepared for educational and informational purposes only. This material is not
legal advice or legal opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create and receipt does not constitute a
lawyer-client relationship between BS Kids LLC , the author of the information and any other legal publisher. Customers of BS Kids should not act
upon this information without seeking professional counsel. The opinions expressed in the material presented to BS Kids clientele is based on
information found in legal publications. BS Kids LLC, 6 Mackinac Court, Pooler, Ga. 31322 (912) 988-1001 or 781-756-1214.
legal advice or legal opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create and receipt does not constitute a
lawyer-client relationship between BS Kids LLC , the author of the information and any other legal publisher. Customers of BS Kids should not act
upon this information without seeking professional counsel. The opinions expressed in the material presented to BS Kids clientele is based on
information found in legal publications. BS Kids LLC, 6 Mackinac Court, Pooler, Ga. 31322 (912) 988-1001 or 781-756-1214.
A Child Advocacy Company
Bringing Support to Parents
Building Strength to Children
Bringing Support to Parents
Building Strength to Children
News
Are Marriage Statistics Divorced from Reality?
By Belinda Luscombe
Do half of all marriages really end in divorce? It's probably the most often quoted statistic about modern
love, and it's a total buzz kill, in line with saying that half of all new shoes will give you hammertoes or that
50% of babies will grow up to be ugly. Now the divorce stat is coming under scrutiny — and not just
because of its unromanticity.
"It's a very murky statistic," says Jennifer Baker, director of the marriage- and family-therapy programs at
Forest Institute, a postgraduate psychology school in Springfield, Mo. She's often erroneously credited
with arriving at the 50% figure; it was around long before she used it. Figuring out divorce rates is tricky.
Not all states collect marital data, and the numbers change dramatically depending on the methods and
sources that are used. In the end, the best that researchers can do is look for trends within a specific
group or cohort (say, all people who married in the 1980s) and project what will happen. As Baker says,
"It's very difficult to know, if a couple gets married today, whether they'll still be married in 40 years."
But in an upbeat new guide to marriage, For Better, Tara Parker-Pope, a New York Times reporter (and
divorcée), devotes a chapter to debunking the 50% stat, at least among the subset of the population that
reads books like hers. Since the 1970s, when more women started going to college and delaying marriage,
"marital stability appears to be improving each decade," she writes.
For example, about 23% of college graduates who married in the '70s split within 10 years. For those who
wed in the '90s, the rate dropped to 16%.
According to research at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, one of the clearest predictors
of whether wedding vows will stick is the age of the people saying them. Take the '80s: a full 81% of
college graduates who got hitched in that decade at age 26 or older were still married 20 years later. Only
65% of college grads who said I do before their 26th birthday made it that far.
But just 49% of those who married young and did so without a degree lasted 20 years, a cohort that
Parker-Pope spends little time discussing. Instead she contends that the 50% stat is a myth that persists
because it's something of a political Swiss Army knife, handy for any number of agendas.
Social conservatives use it to call for more marriage-friendly policies, while liberals find it handy to press
for funding for programs that help single moms.
Moreover, Parker-Pope argues, all the talk about grim marriage stats becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. "It
makes us ambivalent and more vulnerable to giving up when problems occur," she writes. Perhaps, but
there may still be truth to it. Penn State sociologist Paul Amato, in a thorough new report on interpreting
divorce data, writes that the half-of-all-marriages-end-badly figure still "appears to be reasonably
accurate."
What seems most clear is that less-educated, lower-income couples split up more often than college grads
and may be doing so in higher numbers than before. "The people who are most likely to get divorced have
the least resources to deal with its impact, particularly on children," says Amato.
Talk about buzz kill.
By Belinda Luscombe
Do half of all marriages really end in divorce? It's probably the most often quoted statistic about modern
love, and it's a total buzz kill, in line with saying that half of all new shoes will give you hammertoes or that
50% of babies will grow up to be ugly. Now the divorce stat is coming under scrutiny — and not just
because of its unromanticity.
"It's a very murky statistic," says Jennifer Baker, director of the marriage- and family-therapy programs at
Forest Institute, a postgraduate psychology school in Springfield, Mo. She's often erroneously credited
with arriving at the 50% figure; it was around long before she used it. Figuring out divorce rates is tricky.
Not all states collect marital data, and the numbers change dramatically depending on the methods and
sources that are used. In the end, the best that researchers can do is look for trends within a specific
group or cohort (say, all people who married in the 1980s) and project what will happen. As Baker says,
"It's very difficult to know, if a couple gets married today, whether they'll still be married in 40 years."
But in an upbeat new guide to marriage, For Better, Tara Parker-Pope, a New York Times reporter (and
divorcée), devotes a chapter to debunking the 50% stat, at least among the subset of the population that
reads books like hers. Since the 1970s, when more women started going to college and delaying marriage,
"marital stability appears to be improving each decade," she writes.
For example, about 23% of college graduates who married in the '70s split within 10 years. For those who
wed in the '90s, the rate dropped to 16%.
According to research at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School, one of the clearest predictors
of whether wedding vows will stick is the age of the people saying them. Take the '80s: a full 81% of
college graduates who got hitched in that decade at age 26 or older were still married 20 years later. Only
65% of college grads who said I do before their 26th birthday made it that far.
But just 49% of those who married young and did so without a degree lasted 20 years, a cohort that
Parker-Pope spends little time discussing. Instead she contends that the 50% stat is a myth that persists
because it's something of a political Swiss Army knife, handy for any number of agendas.
Social conservatives use it to call for more marriage-friendly policies, while liberals find it handy to press
for funding for programs that help single moms.
Moreover, Parker-Pope argues, all the talk about grim marriage stats becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. "It
makes us ambivalent and more vulnerable to giving up when problems occur," she writes. Perhaps, but
there may still be truth to it. Penn State sociologist Paul Amato, in a thorough new report on interpreting
divorce data, writes that the half-of-all-marriages-end-badly figure still "appears to be reasonably
accurate."
What seems most clear is that less-educated, lower-income couples split up more often than college grads
and may be doing so in higher numbers than before. "The people who are most likely to get divorced have
the least resources to deal with its impact, particularly on children," says Amato.
Talk about buzz kill.
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |