Disclaimer: BS Kids LLC legal research and information has been prepared for educational and informational purposes only. This material is not
legal advice or legal opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create and receipt does not constitute a
lawyer-client relationship between BS Kids LLC , the author of the information and any other legal publisher. Customers of BS Kids should not act
upon this information without seeking professional counsel. The opinions expressed in the material presented to BS Kids clientele is based on
information found in legal publications. BS Kids LLC, 6 Mackinac Court, Pooler, Ga. 31322 (912) 988-1001 or 781-756-1214.
legal advice or legal opinions on any specific matters. Transmission of the information is not intended to create and receipt does not constitute a
lawyer-client relationship between BS Kids LLC , the author of the information and any other legal publisher. Customers of BS Kids should not act
upon this information without seeking professional counsel. The opinions expressed in the material presented to BS Kids clientele is based on
information found in legal publications. BS Kids LLC, 6 Mackinac Court, Pooler, Ga. 31322 (912) 988-1001 or 781-756-1214.
A Child Advocacy Company
Bringing Support to Parents
Building Strength to Children
Bringing Support to Parents
Building Strength to Children
News
MA Supreme Judicial Court Rules Against F & F’s Child Support Lawsuit
September 7th, 2011 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director
Many Massachusetts child support obligors are being driven underground, out of their homes, and out of
their children’s lives by impossible child support demands. Fathers and Families filed and pursued a highly-
publicized lawsuit challenging the state’s new child support guidelines–guidelines which actually raise child
support levels in a terrible economy. Our lawsuit made it all the way up to Massachusetts’ highest court,
the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, which ruled against us.
Our lawsuit has garnered extensive media coverage, including the recent pieces Dads’ group seeks child-
support reform (Boston Herald, 9/2/11), SJC Upholds Child Support Guidelines (WBUR [NPR, Boston],
9/2/11), SJC rejects challenge to child support rules filed by fathers group (Boston Globe, 9/2/11), and
Mass. high court upholds child support guidelines (Associated Press, 9/1/11), as well as previous pieces in
the New York Times, Newsweek, Psychology Today, CBS radio, WRKO in Boston, FOX 25 TV in Boston,
and many others.
The Battle to Reform One of the Nation’s Most Inequitable Child Support Guidelines
In 2001, Fathers and Families was instrumental in winning changes in Massachusetts law which lowered
child support by 15%. Our victory saved noncustodial parents over $1 billion—$200 a million a year over
five years. That’s $1 billion that Massachusetts non-custodial parents were able to spend on their children
themselves.
The opposition struck back by stacking a special committee with reliable votes for increasing the child
support amounts. Fathers and Families founder Ned Holstein, MD, MS had won a seat on this committee
but it ignored the data he presented showing that the proposed new child support orders were far too high
for most obligors to pay. Holstein prepared a Minority Report detailing the problems with the new
Guidelines, which went into effect January 1, 2009.
What’s Wrong with the New Guidelines?
The new guidelines are causing substantial increases in child support in the vast majority of cases. Many
obligors will see increases of “only” 20%, but some will see a tripling of their child support order, even
when they are poor and the recipient is wealthy. In high income cases, the child support order for one child
could exceed $50,000 per year.
How much money is legitimately needed to support a child? Far less than the Guidelines require, in many
cases. If a recipient and payor earn the same amount, when all factors are taken into consideration, the
recipient will enjoy a standard of living almost double that of the payor. This holds true throughout the
broad range of middle class incomes. Instead of the child-friendly “two-condo solution,” the new Guidelines
produce a “castle and shack” outcome.
Working with attorney Gregory Hession of Springfield, F & F quickly filed a lawsuit seeking to block the
Guidelines’ implementation. We argued, among other things, that the new guidelines were not formulated
using the actual costs of raising a child, as required by federal law, and are thus “arbitrary and capricious.”
Additionally, the state bypassed the normal legislative process by having a secret committee prepare them
and a single judge declare them to be law, in violation of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. To read
our original legal complaint, click here. To read the Memorandum of Law, click here.
MA Supreme Judicial Court Rules Against Us
The Court decided to hear our case but ruled against us, writing:
The plaintiffs will have an opportunity to raise their constitutional arguments when their cases are heard
before the Probate and Family Court (or other trial court), and to pursue appellate remedies if they are
dissatisfied with the outcomes of those cases.
Child support obligors struggling with excessive child support obligations in the worst economy since the
Great Depression are hardly in a position to fund long, expensive legal battles as individuals. This is the
reason why Fathers and Families’ Legal Defense Fund filed this case to begin with–we know individual
obligors can’t afford to fund their own battles, so we’re working to change the guidelines for all obligors.
September 7th, 2011 by Glenn Sacks, MA, Executive Director
Many Massachusetts child support obligors are being driven underground, out of their homes, and out of
their children’s lives by impossible child support demands. Fathers and Families filed and pursued a highly-
publicized lawsuit challenging the state’s new child support guidelines–guidelines which actually raise child
support levels in a terrible economy. Our lawsuit made it all the way up to Massachusetts’ highest court,
the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, which ruled against us.
Our lawsuit has garnered extensive media coverage, including the recent pieces Dads’ group seeks child-
support reform (Boston Herald, 9/2/11), SJC Upholds Child Support Guidelines (WBUR [NPR, Boston],
9/2/11), SJC rejects challenge to child support rules filed by fathers group (Boston Globe, 9/2/11), and
Mass. high court upholds child support guidelines (Associated Press, 9/1/11), as well as previous pieces in
the New York Times, Newsweek, Psychology Today, CBS radio, WRKO in Boston, FOX 25 TV in Boston,
and many others.
The Battle to Reform One of the Nation’s Most Inequitable Child Support Guidelines
In 2001, Fathers and Families was instrumental in winning changes in Massachusetts law which lowered
child support by 15%. Our victory saved noncustodial parents over $1 billion—$200 a million a year over
five years. That’s $1 billion that Massachusetts non-custodial parents were able to spend on their children
themselves.
The opposition struck back by stacking a special committee with reliable votes for increasing the child
support amounts. Fathers and Families founder Ned Holstein, MD, MS had won a seat on this committee
but it ignored the data he presented showing that the proposed new child support orders were far too high
for most obligors to pay. Holstein prepared a Minority Report detailing the problems with the new
Guidelines, which went into effect January 1, 2009.
What’s Wrong with the New Guidelines?
The new guidelines are causing substantial increases in child support in the vast majority of cases. Many
obligors will see increases of “only” 20%, but some will see a tripling of their child support order, even
when they are poor and the recipient is wealthy. In high income cases, the child support order for one child
could exceed $50,000 per year.
How much money is legitimately needed to support a child? Far less than the Guidelines require, in many
cases. If a recipient and payor earn the same amount, when all factors are taken into consideration, the
recipient will enjoy a standard of living almost double that of the payor. This holds true throughout the
broad range of middle class incomes. Instead of the child-friendly “two-condo solution,” the new Guidelines
produce a “castle and shack” outcome.
Working with attorney Gregory Hession of Springfield, F & F quickly filed a lawsuit seeking to block the
Guidelines’ implementation. We argued, among other things, that the new guidelines were not formulated
using the actual costs of raising a child, as required by federal law, and are thus “arbitrary and capricious.”
Additionally, the state bypassed the normal legislative process by having a secret committee prepare them
and a single judge declare them to be law, in violation of the Massachusetts Declaration of Rights. To read
our original legal complaint, click here. To read the Memorandum of Law, click here.
MA Supreme Judicial Court Rules Against Us
The Court decided to hear our case but ruled against us, writing:
The plaintiffs will have an opportunity to raise their constitutional arguments when their cases are heard
before the Probate and Family Court (or other trial court), and to pursue appellate remedies if they are
dissatisfied with the outcomes of those cases.
Child support obligors struggling with excessive child support obligations in the worst economy since the
Great Depression are hardly in a position to fund long, expensive legal battles as individuals. This is the
reason why Fathers and Families’ Legal Defense Fund filed this case to begin with–we know individual
obligors can’t afford to fund their own battles, so we’re working to change the guidelines for all obligors.
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |
| |
 |